GovCon Bid and Proposal Insights
GovCon Bid and Proposal Insights
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E) Engineering and Technical Support (RETS)
Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.
This episode dives into the RETS IDIQ supporting OUSD(R&E), a major DoD contract vehicle enabling research, engineering, prototyping, and advanced technology support across modernization priorities like AI/ML, autonomy, cyber, space, hypersonics, and 5G. We break down the core task areas, contract structure, and where industry expertise is most valuable.
Listen now to learn where your capabilities fit, how task orders will be competed, and how to position early for this high-value DoD opportunity.
Contact ProposalHelper at sales@proposalhelper.com to find similar opportunities and help you build a realistic and winning pipeline.
I want you to picture a scene. It's late, maybe a Tuesday. You're sitting at uh a generic gray desk in a generic gray office.
SPEAKER_00:We've all been there.
SPEAKER_02:Exactly. And in front of you is this stack of paper, about three inches thick. And it looks like the driest, most soul-crushing administrative paperwork you have ever seen.
SPEAKER_00:Aaron Ross Powell The kind of document that's, you know, practically designed to make your eyes glaze over.
SPEAKER_02:Totally. We're talking standard government font, Times New Roman, endless acronyms and paragraphs that just seem to run on for pages. But then you flip to the section on pricing.
SPEAKER_00:Ah, yes, the important part.
SPEAKER_02:You look at the estimated ceiling value for this pile of paper, and suddenly you are very, very wide awake because the number you're looking at is$496 million.
SPEAKER_00:Aaron Ross Powell Nearly half a billion dollars buried in a PDF that looks like it belongs in a filing cabinet from 1995.
SPEAKER_02:Right. And once you get past that initial shock and you start actually reading the fine print, you realize you aren't looking at an accounting spreadsheet.
SPEAKER_00:Not at all.
SPEAKER_02:You're looking at the blueprint for the next generation of global warfare. We are not talking about office supplies here. We're talking about hypersonics, directed energy, kill chains, and literal teams of engineers hired to think like supervillains.
SPEAKER_00:It really is a fascinating contradiction, isn't it? The document itself is purely administrative. It's a contract solicitation. They call it RET. But what's inside that holds the roadmap for how the Department of War plans to maintain technological dominance?
SPEAKER_02:Aaron Powell So that is our mission today. We are doing a deep dive into this half billion dollar wish list. We've pulled the request for proposal, the performance work statement, and uh the security guidelines. Aaron Powell A whole stack. We're gonna unpack what RETs is, who it's for, and why this boring-looking document is actually, I think, a script for the future of combat.
SPEAKER_00:Aaron Powell And that's often where the most interesting details are hidden. Right there in the performance work statement. You just have to know how to decode it.
SPEAKER_02:So let's start at the very top. Who is the client here? Who has half a billion dollars to spend on engineering support?
SPEAKER_00:Aaron Powell The Client is the office of the Under Secretary of War for Research and Engineering. The acronym, because there's always an acronym, is OUSWRE.
SPEAKER_02:OUSWRE.
SPEAKER_00:Okay. That is a mouthful.
SPEAKER_02:Yeah, I wouldn't recommend trying to say it fast. But you can think of this office as the chief technology officer for the entire Department of War.
SPEAKER_00:Aaron Powell So like the CTO of the Army or Bigger.
SPEAKER_02:It's the CTO of everything. Army, Navy, Air Force, Space Force. Their mandate is incredibly specific and frankly, incredibly high stakes. Their job isn't just to buy weapons, it's to foster technological dominance.
SPEAKER_00:Aaron Powell I noticed that phrase in the source material, technological dominance. It felt aggressive. It's not technological parity or keeping up.
SPEAKER_02:No. It means staying so far ahead that the fight isn't even fair. The documents make it clear this office oversees the entire research enterprise. They break their needs down into um three main buckets. Okay. First, there's advanced capabilities. That's finding the stereo new tech. Second, research and technology overseeing the labs. And third, modernization. And modernization is where we get into the heavy hitters. The background section lists these modernization priority areas, and it just reads like a bingo card for 21st century anxiety.
SPEAKER_00:It does cover pretty much every nightmare scenario, yes.
SPEAKER_02:We're talking artificial intelligence, autonomy, biotechnology, cyber, directed energy, hypersonics, microelectronics. Quantum science, 5G, and space. I mean, it's basically everything.
SPEAKER_00:Aaron Powell It is. But here's the key context. For you and me, those might be buzzwords. For this office, they are survival strategies. Yeah. The Department of War is, well, terrified of falling behind in any one of these areas. Right. If an adversary gets functional quantum computing before we do, our encryption is gone. If they get hypersonics first, our missile defense systems could be obsolete overnight.
SPEAKER_02:So this isn't just we want cool gadgets. This is if we don't figure this out, we lose.
SPEAKER_00:Precisely. And that is where the Route's contract comes in. Route stands for Research Development, Test, Evaluation, Engineering, and Technical Support. It's a mechanism to bring in a massive workforce of experts.
SPEAKER_02:Okay, so we know the player, the CTO of war, and we know the game staying ahead. But let's talk about how they actually buy this brain power. You mentioned this as an IDIQ. What does that actually mean?
SPEAKER_00:It stands for indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity.
SPEAKER_02:Which sounds incredibly vague.
SPEAKER_00:It is vague on purpose. Think of it like a massive retainer agreement for a brain trust. The government knows they're going to need a lot of engineering help over the next five years.
SPEAKER_02:But they don't know exactly what problem will pop up on a Tuesday in 2027.
SPEAKER_00:Exactly. So instead of running a new hiring competition every single time, which would take months, they hire a roster of companies now. They vet them, they give them clearances, and they say, here's a credit limit of$496 million. Be ready.
SPEAKER_02:It's like having a plumber on speed dial, but instead of fixing a leak, they're fixing a gap in quantum radar coverage.
SPEAKER_00:That's a really good analogy.
SPEAKER_02:Yeah.
SPEAKER_00:When a specific problem comes up, they issue what's called a task order, and the contractor has to respond immediately.
SPEAKER_02:Okay, let's get into the actual work. The performance work statement lists seven specific tasks. And this is where it gets really interesting because it shifts from just building stuff to imagining doomsday scenarios.
SPEAKER_00:It really does cover the full spectrum.
SPEAKER_02:Task one and task two seem to be the bread and butter engineering, prototyping, and testing. But the language here is very specific. They talk about mission engineering. What's the difference there?
SPEAKER_00:No, it's a crucial distinction. In the old days, you'd have systems engineering. You're building a fighter jet. Your job is to make sure the jet flies, the engine works, the radar turns on, you're focused on the object.
SPEAKER_02:On the machine itself.
SPEAKER_00:Right. Mission engineering treats the entire mission as the system. So it asks, does the jet communicating with the satellite, which is talking to the cyber operator in Virginia, does that whole chain actually achieve the warfighting effect?
SPEAKER_02:So you aren't just designing the gadget. You're designing the web that the gadget lives in.
SPEAKER_00:Exactly. It involves end-to-end control. Maybe the jet doesn't need a bigger gun if the cyber operator can shut down the enemy's shields first. Mission engineering figures out those trade-offs.
SPEAKER_02:And then you have the prototyping side. It says they need to conduct these events in operationally relevant environments.
SPEAKER_00:That is code four. Get it out of the lab.
SPEAKER_02:Don't show us this working in a sterile room with air conditioning.
SPEAKER_00:Precisely. They want to see if these concepts work in the mud. They want to see if it works when someone is jamming your GPS or when it's raining sideways. They're looking for the unknown effects. It's the try it and see what breaks phase.
SPEAKER_02:Which brings us to task three, because apparently breaking real things is expensive.
SPEAKER_00:Very. So task three is modeling and simulation. This is digital engineering.
SPEAKER_02:Now to me, that sounds like running a computer simulation, like a video game. But the contract treats it as something much more significant.
SPEAKER_00:It is. The goal here is the digital twin concept. Instead of physically building a prototype missile for$10 million and firing it into a wall, you build a logical, physics-based representation of it, a digital twin.
SPEAKER_02:A virtual version that obeys the laws of physics.
SPEAKER_00:Yes, but incredibly high fidelity. You can run thousands of simulations in a day. You can crash that digital missile a million times in a million different weather conditions before you ever cut a single piece of metal.
SPEAKER_02:That seems like it would save a fortune.
SPEAKER_00:It saves money, but more importantly, it buys time. And it allows you to test scenarios you could never do in real life. You can't really test a biological weapon defense in a populated city in the real world, but you can in a digital twin.
SPEAKER_02:That is both reassuring and slightly terrifying.
SPEAKER_00:Welcome to defense contracting.
SPEAKER_02:Speaking of terrifying, let's look at task four. Honestly, this is the one that stopped me in my tracks. Operations research.
SPEAKER_00:You're talking about the red teaming.
SPEAKER_02:Yes. The contract explicitly asks for red teaming for horizon scanning. What is that?
SPEAKER_00:This is a vital part of the contract. Red teaming is the practice of adopting the adversary's mindset. The contract asks the contractor to bring in experts who are explicitly paid to think like the enemy.
SPEAKER_02:So professional trolls. High-stakes trolls.
SPEAKER_00:In a way. The document asks them to identify areas where small investments could offset adversary capabilities, but more importantly, it asks them to challenge groupthink.
SPEAKER_02:I love that that is written into a federal contract. Please, we are begging you, break our groupthink.
SPEAKER_00:Aaron Powell It's a recognition of a massive weakness. Big bureaucracies like the Pentagon tend to become echo chambers. Everyone agrees with the boss. They need an outsider, this RETS contractor, to come in and say, actually, I wouldn't attack your shiny new shield. I'd just hack the power grid that runs it.
SPEAKER_02:That's the horizon standing part, looking for threats that aren't here yet.
SPEAKER_00:Aaron Powell And that ties directly into another term used in Task 4 that I think is worth explaining kill chain analysis.
SPEAKER_02:Yeah, let's unpack that. Killchain. Sounds aggressive.
SPEAKER_00:It is, but it's a technical term. A kill chain is just the sequence of events required to launch an attack. We use the acronym FTT2EA. Find, fix, track, target, engage, and assess.
SPEAKER_01:Find it, lock onto it, shoot it, check if it blew up.
SPEAKER_00:Exactly. Now the contract requires the engineers to mathematically model these kill chains, both ours and the adversaries. They have to look for vulnerabilities.
SPEAKER_02:So it can be an example.
SPEAKER_00:Well, think about that chain. If you can break just one link, say, if you can stop the enemy from tracking you, the whole attack fails. You just need to confuse the sensor that guides the missile.
SPEAKER_02:So they are paying these engineers to mathematically model the steps of a battle, figure out where the weak points are, and then tell the government how to exploit them.
SPEAKER_00:In a networked cross-domain environment, as the contract notes, space, cyber, land, sea all interconnected. It's incredibly complex 4D chess.
SPEAKER_02:It makes my head hurt just thinking about the math. And that leads us to task five, which seems to be about keeping track of all these smart people. Science and technology oversight.
SPEAKER_00:This is the governance piece. Remember, OUSWRENE is the CTO. They have to oversee the labs, the workforce, and the FFRDCs and URCs.
SPEAKER_02:The Alphabet Soup returns.
SPEAKER_00:Think big brain institutions, places like MIT Lincoln Lab. The RETS contractor has to convene panels of eminent experts to judge the quality of the research coming out of those places. In a sense, yes, providing independent assessments. Is this quantum research actually viable, or is it just theory? The government needs to know it's getting its money's worth.
SPEAKER_01:Now we've talked about the high-level stuff, but there's a practical side too. Task six is data management.
SPEAKER_00:Which is often overlooked, but absolutely critical. You can't do AI or machine learning without massive amounts of clean, validated data.
SPEAKER_02:It's not just engineering physics, it's engineering information.
SPEAKER_00:Right. If your data is bad, your AI is bad. And if your AI is controlling a weapon system, well, you have a very big problem.
SPEAKER_02:And then there is task seven, ad hoc surge support, which I assume is the panic button.
SPEAKER_00:Basically. But there was one detail in task seven that I found absolutely hilarious in its specificity.
SPEAKER_02:I think I know what you're gonna say. The conference room.
SPEAKER_00:The conference room. Amidst all this talk of hypersonics and kill chains, the contract stipulates that the contractor must have a conference room within 15 miles of the Pentagon.
SPEAKER_02:Not 16 miles. Fifteen.
SPEAKER_00:And it has to hold 75 people and be secure for secret level discussions.
SPEAKER_02:I just love that image. We need to plan the future of global warfare. But first, Dave, did you book the room? Does it have a whiteboard?
SPEAKER_00:It sounds bureaucratic, but think about it. If the undersecretary needs to convene a massive emergency review, they can't always find space in the Pentagon. They need a secure offsite, close by, ready to go.
SPEAKER_02:We need to save the world, but we also need parking.
SPEAKER_00:Exactly. And speaking of security, that brings us to the how. We have to talk about the DD Form 254.
SPEAKER_02:The security classification specification. This isn't your standard office job.
SPEAKER_00:Far from it. The document specifies that work will be performed up to the top secret level. But it goes further. It mentions SCI sensitive compartmented information and SAP special access programs.
SPEAKER_02:SAP, that's the black budget stuff, right?
SPEAKER_00:Those are the programs with highly restricted access, yes. The contract also mentions ACCM alternative compensatory control measures. Basically, this is work where the need to know is strictly enforced.
SPEAKER_02:You can't just talk to your colleague at the next desk about what you're working on.
SPEAKER_00:No, not unless they are read in to that specific program.
SPEAKER_02:There's a line in there about physical security that stood out. At the close of each work period, government facilities shall be secured.
SPEAKER_00:No taking work home, no checking email from your couch. When you are working on special access programs, the physical security is absolute. You work in a SCIF.
SPEAKER_02:A SCIF. Paint that picture for us.
SPEAKER_00:It's a room with no windows, soundproof walls, a heavy safe door with a complex lock, no cell phones, no smart watches. When you leave at five, the work stays there.
SPEAKER_02:It really paints a picture of the lifestyle. You're working on the cutting edge of technology, but you can't tell your spouse what you did today.
SPEAKER_00:It's a unique existence. Yeah. And you are likely commuting to the national capital region. The contract specifies that travel within 50 miles of the Pentagon isn't reimbursed. That's just your daily grind. But if they send you overseas, then you get Status of Forces agreement or sofa status, housing allowances, school reimbursement. You essentially become part of the deployed force structure.
SPEAKER_02:It's such a fascinating mix. You have these high-level intellectual tasks mixed with the mundane realities of government contracting.
SPEAKER_00:Yeah.
SPEAKER_02:Monthly status reports, travel vouchers, booking that conference room.
SPEAKER_00:Aaron Powell That is the reality of the defense industrial base. It's not just soldiers or scientists, it's this massive layer of support services, RETs, that connects the two.
SPEAKER_02:So let's synthesize this. We have a client, the OUSW RE, trying to stay dominant. We have a contractor getting paid half a billion dollars to provide the brains. What's the big takeaway for you?
SPEAKER_00:For me, the takeaway is that innovation requires infrastructure. We tend to think of innovation as a eureka moment in a garage.
SPEAKER_02:A genius invents a thing.
SPEAKER_00:Right. But in the Department of War, innovation is a process. It is a grind. It needs a performance work statement. You could have a brilliant idea for a laser weapon, but without REITs, without the mission engineering, the modeling, the red teaming, that brilliant idea is useless.
SPEAKER_02:Urkey is the engine room.
SPEAKER_00:It is. It's the administrative and technical engine that takes a concept and grinds it into a reality.
SPEAKER_02:And there's a human element here too, right? The document keeps mentioning non-personal services.
SPEAKER_00:That's a critical legal distinction. The government cannot supervise these contractor employees. They aren't government staff. The contractor manages them.
SPEAKER_02:So the government says, here's the outcome we need. The contractor says, okay, I'll assign Alice and Bob, but the government can't tell Alice and Bob how to format their spreadsheet.
SPEAKER_00:Correct. It's a separation of powers. The government sets the destination. The contractor steers the car.
SPEAKER_02:It's a fascinating ecosystem, a half billion dollar ecosystem that exists almost entirely in the shadows.
SPEAKER_00:And one that is absolutely essential to the modern way of war.
SPEAKER_02:So as we wrap up this deep dive, we've seen the what? The seven tasks, we've seen the IDIQ structure, the security.
SPEAKER_00:And we've seen the why technological dominance in an era of rapid change.
SPEAKER_02:It really changes how you look at those boring government solicitations.
SPEAKER_00:Before we go, though, there is one thing I'm still thinking about. One provocative thought for you, the listener.
SPEAKER_02:What's that?
SPEAKER_00:We talked about the red teaming task, the requirement for the contractor to challenge groupthink.
SPEAKER_02:Right. Tell us why our plan fails.
SPEAKER_00:But remember, this is a contractor. They are being paid by the very people they are supposed to challenge. They have a five-year contract with a ceiling they want to reach. In a massive bureaucracy with hundreds of millions of dollars on the line, how effective can a paid contractor truly be at telling their boss your pet project is a disaster? Can you really buy independent thought on an hourly basis?
SPEAKER_02:That is the half billion dollar question. If you're listening, ask yourself would you have the guts to tell the person signing your paycheck that their strategy is flawed?
SPEAKER_00:It's a tough position to be in.
SPEAKER_02:It certainly is. Well, on that note, thanks for joining us on this deep dive into the blueprint of defense engineering. We'll see you next time.
SPEAKER_00:See you next time.