GovCon Bid and Proposal Insights
GovCon Bid and Proposal Insights
Administrative, Clerical, and Non-Scientific Support Services
Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.
In this episode, we break down the upcoming MA-IDIQ: Administrative, Clerical, and Non-Scientific Support Services contract from the Department of Commerce – National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Set aside exclusively for SBA-certified Women-Owned Small Businesses (WOSBs), this $30.28M opportunity includes 6 anticipated awards and a planned RFP release in June 2025.
We’ll explore:
- Contract scope and service areas
- Set-aside requirements for WOSBs
- Insights on the previous RFP and incumbent landscape
- What your business can do now to get a head start
If you're a WOSB looking to expand into NOAA or federal administrative support, this episode is a must-listen.
🎧 Tune in now and gain the edge in your capture planning!
Contact ProposalHelper at sales@proposalhelper.com to find similar opportunities and help you build a realistic and winning pipeline.
Introduction to NOAA's Solicitation Amendment
Speaker 1Welcome to the Deep Dive. We're here to take those sometimes dense documents and really pull out the core insights, help you get smart facts Exactly.
Speaker 2And today we're tackling something that sounds well pretty. Official Amendment 0001 to solicitation 1305 M320 RNFP 0004.
Speaker 1Okay, quite a title. So this came out April 6, 2020, Western Acquisition Division Contracts Branch.
Speaker 2That's the one and the solicitation itself. The original call for bids was for administrative, clerical and non-scientific support for NOAA fisheries Pacific Coast regions.
Speaker 1Right, so an amendment that's like the Q&A session basically, or updates.
Speaker 2Yeah, think of it like that the government puts out the initial request, companies ask, ask questions and this amendment is where the government answers and it gives you a real kind of behind-the-scenes, look.
Speaker 1Okay. So our mission for this deep dive. Let's unpack the key clarifications in this amendment. What does it tell us about the job? The proposal rules what the government was really after perfect.
Speaker 2Let's dive in first up. Maybe how many contracts were they actually planning to award? Just one winner good question.
Speaker 1They actually said they intended to award multiple contracts. They cited CIR-1352.21574B, now C-A-R. What's that stand for again?
Multiple Awards and Contract Structure
Speaker 2C-R is the Commerce Acquisition Regulation, so specific rules for the Department of Commerce, which NOAA is part of. And that rule basically says yeah, we can make multiple awards. The amendment also mentioned the exact number would depend on the proposals they got back.
Speaker 1Right, makes sense, spreads the risk, maybe gets more diverse skills, and they mentioned who was doing the work before this. Didn't they the incumbent?
Speaker 2They did. It was a company called Leading Solutions. Their contract was AB133F15CQ00031.
Speaker 1And that was valued at what? $13.5 million.
Speaker 2Yeah for a single award, IDIQ contract.
Speaker 1Okay, idiq, another one of those acronyms.
Speaker 2Yeah, Delivering indefinite quantity. Basically it's like a flexible contract. The government doesn't commit to buying a fixed amount up front, but they can place orders for services as needed over a period.
Speaker 1So it's like a pre-approved menu they can order from Knowing. The last one was $13.5 million gives us a sense of scale.
Speaker 2Definitely Now. If you wanted to bid, you had to write a proposal and there were some pretty tight limits on that. Right Page counts.
Speaker 1Oh yeah, the amendment hammered this home 40 pages max for the technical proposal. And that includes everything Graphics resumes, everything Graphics resumes tables, the whole shebang and double space. They even cited the rule again CRR 1352-215-70B.
Speaker 2Wow, 40 pages, double space. That's tight. You really need to be focused.
Speaker 1No kidding, what about those past performance questionnaires, ppqs, did they count?
Speaker 2Ah, good point. No, they clarified that Since PPQs are filled out by your references third parties and sent directly to the government, they do not count against that 40-page limit.
Speaker 1Okay, that's a relief.
Speaker 2Yeah, and they also noted the PPQs could be for the main bidder, the prime, or for their subcontractors.
Speaker 1Makes sense Now. Deadlines always crucial in government contracting. Any flexibility on the due date.
Speaker 2Absolutely none. They were very clear. April 15th 2020, 2 pm Pacific. That was it. No extensions.
Speaker 1And submission had to be electronic.
Speaker 2Yep Electronic only, no paper copies.
Proposal Requirements and Deadlines
Speaker 1Got it Hard. Deadline Electronic submission Okay. What about how long the work would actually go on for the period of performance?
Speaker 2Right, there were a few dates floating around, so the amendment nailed this down the main IDIQ ordering period, that five-year window is June 1st 2020 to May 31st 2025.
Speaker 1Okay, five years for the overall agreement.
Speaker 2But the initial task orders the first specific jobs. They had a slightly different timeframe October 1st 2020 to September 30th 2025.
Speaker 1So the first work starts a bit later.
Speaker 2Exactly, and they also stressed that they could issue other task orders anytime during that main five-year IDIQ period.
Speaker 1Okay, that clears it up. And for proving your experience, how far back did that past performance need to go?
Speaker 2Five years. The amendment confirmed that Projects within the last five years.
Speaker 1Standard enough. Now money what was the absolute maximum value for this whole contract thing?
Speaker 2The ceiling across all potential awards combined was set at $25 million $25 million max.
Speaker 1Got it Okay Shifting to the people doing the work, security clearances, anything like that needed.
Speaker 2Not exactly clearances. No, they didn't expect classified work, but background checks definitely required.
Speaker 1Okay, Standard background checks definitely required.
Speaker 2Okay, standard background checks Yep Citing CRR 1352.23771. And also compliance with IT security requirements under CRR 1352.23972. So basic vetting and secure IT practices.
Speaker 1Makes sense Now. Inside the proposal documents there was some confusion about summaries like an executive summary versus another summary.
Speaker 2Yeah, that came up. The original solicitation mentioned an executive summary in the business volume and a summary of program proposal. The amendment clarified they are distinct things.
Speaker 1So don't just copy paste. Pretty much, right.
Task Orders and Geographic Coverage
Speaker 2Offers, needed to follow the specific instructions for each and put the right info in the right place. Use your judgment, tailor the content.
Speaker 1Okay, what about equipment, computers, software? Who provides that stuff?
Speaker 2That would depend the amendments that will be specified in each task order, but the general rule of thumb.
Speaker 1Yeah.
Speaker 2If the contractor's team is working off-site, the contractor usually provides the hardware and software. If they're working at an NOAA facility, then NOAA might provide.
Speaker 1Okay, depends on the task. Order specifics and location Makes sense. What if someone needs time off like vacation, or they leave the job? How does the contractor keep things running?
Speaker 2Good question. The government expects continuous service during work hours. They get that people take planned leave. You know short-term stuff that can be coordinated. But the amendment really emphasized that the contractor is responsible for covering longer absences or if someone leaves, no service disruptions allowed. It's part of their staffing and management plan evaluation.
Speaker 1Right, you need a backup plan. Ok, the amendment also updated the list of job types, right, labor categories and pricing.
Speaker 2It did Added quite a few.
Speaker 1Yeah.
Speaker 2Let's see Archives technician consultants, either third data validator facilitators, either third infotechs, either third scientific librarian.
Speaker 1Okay, a broader range of roles.
Speaker 2Yep, and they also added graphic designer to the pricing schedule. Updated lists for both were attached to the amendment, so bidders needed the newest versions.
Speaker 1Crucial detail Now wages. Government contracts often involve specific wage rules. Anything mentioned for, say, oregon.
Speaker 2Yes, absolutely. They specified that for work in Oregon, wage determination number 2015-5563 applies. That's under the Service Contract Act.
Speaker 1Which means contractors have to pay at least the local prevailing wage and benefits.
Speaker 2Exactly Key for compliance and pricing correctly.
Speaker 1Okay, Now those initial task order RFPs, the sample jobs they include. Can you break those down?
Speaker 2Sure, there were two RFP tag. One was for the NOAA West Coast Regions OMI Division in Portland. Oh my Operations Management and Information. It had two parts. Requirement one was Portland front desk and admin support. Requirement two was admin and record support, but for the Boise office.
Speaker 1OK, one RFP, two requirements in Portland and Boise. What was RFP of FETAG 2?
Speaker 2RFPTT was for the Oregon-Washington Coastal Office, the OWCO, based in Lacey Washington. This one had three requirements.
Speaker 1Okay.
Speaker 2REC 1, lacey Front Descadman. Rec 2, portland Records Management Admin. Rec 3, add-in Support down in Roseburg Oregon.
Speaker 1Got it Lacey, Portland, Roseburg.
Speaker 2And they also fixed a typo in the amendment. The performance work statement for hashtag two should have said OWCO, not OMI. Right, and the big takeaway here was you had to bid on everything. The amendment stressed that offers had to propose on each requirement in both RFPs all five.
Speaker 1No cherry picking. Those initial tasks you had to show you could handle the range Exactly.
Speaker 2Even though those first tasks were in Oregon, washington, idaho. The amendment reminded everyone the overall IDIQ contract could involve work anywhere in Alaska, hawaii, washington, oregon, california and Idaho.
Speaker 1So be ready for a wider footprint later on.
Speaker 2Definitely.
Speaker 1How are those first task orders evaluated? Was it separate from the main contract award?
Speaker 2Sort of integrated. The amendment said proposals for those initial tasks would be evaluated as part of the overall staffing and management plan evaluation.
Speaker 1OK, so linked to the main evaluation criteria.
Speaker 2Right Citing CIR 1352.21575. But future task orders issued later, those would use the standard fair opportunity procedures from the AERFAR Federal Acquisition Regulation 16.505B.
Speaker 1Okay, so competition among the winners for later work.
Speaker 2Precisely.
Speaker 1Did they specify staffing levels for those initial tasks like FTEs?
Speaker 2They did For RFP, ftag 1, the total was 250 E's per year.
Speaker 1Okay, two full-time equivalents.
Speaker 2For RFP, ftag 2,. The lacy job, rec 1, started at 0.58 FTE in year one, then went up to 1 FTE for years 2 to 5. Interesting wrap up. Yeah, the Portland Records job, rec 2, was 1.
Pricing Strategy and Service Contract Act
Speaker 1FTE the whole time and the Roseburg admin job, rec 3, was 0.68 FTE for all years. Very specific numbers. Okay, you mentioned the potential for work across several states. How did the government factor geographic coverage into their award decision?
Speaker 2They clarified it's one factor they'd consider when looking at the staffing and management plans. They need to make sure they have support across all their locations, so a company showing it could cover multiple areas might have an edge, you know.
Speaker 1Right Demonstrates capability and helps ensure competition for future tasks across the region. What about the how-to for the task? Order, proposals, instructions, evaluation criteria.
Speaker 2The amendment pointed bidders back to the original solicitation for that. It said those details were already in Volume 2B, the Staffing and Management Plan section.
Speaker 1OK, so go read the original doc for that part.
Speaker 2Essentially yes.
Speaker 1And for the people proposed for those tasks? Did they need resumes for everyone?
Speaker 2No, not required at this stage. The amendment said they wanted to see the approach to staffing, but resumes for specific candidates weren't mandatory.
Speaker 1But you could include them.
Speaker 2Yes, they said, if you had identified candidates, including resumes, could help illustrate your staffing plan. Optional but potentially helpful. Melanie WARRICK-.
Speaker 1Gotcha Now, labor categories again. The government provided a list, but could companies propose different ones if they had, say, an innovative approach?
Speaker 2MARK MIRCHANDANI yes, they could. The amendment acknowledged the government's list was just a sample. If a company wanted to propose alternative categories, maybe reflecting a unique team structure, that was okay.
Speaker 1But there's a patch.
Speaker 2Well, you had to make sure your proposed category still met the solicitation's core requirements background, experience, education needed for the actual work. You had to justify it.
Speaker 1So flexibility, but within reason.
Speaker 2Okay.
Speaker 1What about overtime? Did bidders need to price that in up front?
Speaker 2Nope, no-transcript.
Speaker 1Ah, okay.
Speaker 2If it did come up later, it would be handled and priced at the task order level as needed. So ignore it for the main proposal pricing.
Speaker 1Good to know. And speaking of pricing those sample task orders, could bidders offer discounts or did they have to stick to the main contract rates?
Speaker 2Discounts were encouraged. The amendment clarified the main pricing schedule rates were ceiling rates, the maximum.
Speaker 1So you could bid lower on specific tasks.
Speaker 2Absolutely. They explicitly said offering discounts at the task order level was highly encouraged, a way to be more competitive on those first jobs.
Speaker 1Makes sense and for the overall price proposal. Did they need a super detailed cost breakdown?
Speaker 2Not really. The amendment said just providing the fixed ceiling rates for each labor category was enough for the initial proposal. No detailed cost buildup required then.
Speaker 1Okay, simplifies things a bit. Now. The solicitation mentioned GS equivalent pay levels, right Like government employee pay greeds. How were contractors supposed to use that info?
Speaker 2Purely informational. The amendment stressed that those GS rates were just a reference point and didn't include things like locality pay or benefits.
Speaker 1So don't just use the GS rate.
Speaker 2Right. Contractors should base pricing on their own costs, their business practices, while making sure they comply with the Service Contract Act. Wages.
Speaker 1Got it Reference only. Since work could be in different states with different costs, could you submit different price lists per location?
Speaker 2Yes, that was an option. The amendment said if you wanted to offer different ceiling rates for, say, California versus Idaho, you could submit multiple pricing schedules. But it wasn't required.
Speaker 1OK, optional flexibility there. Key personnel we talked about resumes for task staff. What about the main manager? Just one resume needed. Yes confirmed.
Speaker 2Only the resume for the key personnel identified in that SIAR clause, specifically the project lead or program manager, was required.
Speaker 1Just the main person. And where did that project manager need to be located? Did they have to be on the West Coast?
Speaker 2Not strictly required. The amendment acknowledged the work was spread out. While a West Coast presence might be advantageous, it wasn't mandatory.
Speaker 1What was more important?
Speaker 2The overall management plan. They'd evaluate the structure, how you'd provide oversight, including on-site management where needed, regardless of where the main PM sat.
Speaker 1Okay, solid plan over a specific location and the cost for that project manager role part of the task order pricing.
Key Takeaways and Final Thoughts
Speaker 2No separate. The amendment said overall program management cost is an IDIQ level requirement, priced at that higher level, not baked into the task order labor costs.
Speaker 1Right, distinct cost. And just to circle back on the Service Contract Act or SCA, it applies to everyone.
Speaker 2Yes, Crystal clear on that. All positions under the IDIQ are subject to SCA contractor's responsibility to comply.
Speaker 1And they pointed to Attachment 2 for the labor category.
Speaker 2Yep Attachment 2, updated with the amendment, had the expected categories and they confirmed wage determinations were identified for all the work areas. Sca compliance is key.
Speaker 1Okay, last point. Those initial RFPs had line items for travel costs. Did bidders need to add money there?
Speaker 2Nope, straightforward answer. In the amendment Do not propose additional amounts for the travel and reimbursement CLANs in RFP 1 and RFP 2.
Speaker 1Okay, wow, so pulling it all together, the single amendment, amendment 0001,. It really did clarify a ton of detail.
Speaker 2It really did, from the big picture stuff like multiple awards and the overall value, right down to page limits, specific job roles, how to handle pricing.
Speaker 1It paints a much clearer picture for any company that was thinking about bidding, or even just for us trying to understand how this process works.
Speaker 2Absolutely, and seeing these kinds of questions and answers, it's super valuable, not just for this contract, but it gives you real insight into government contracting generally the level of detail, the need for clear communication. It's complex.
Speaker 1It really is. So, thinking about all the ground covered in just this one amendment. What does that suggest to you about the well, the sheer complexity of these solicitations and how vital that back and forth clarification really is?
Speaker 2It just underscores how many moving parts there are, doesn't it? And how critical it is for both sides the government and the bidders to be absolutely clear on expectations.
Speaker 1Yeah.
Speaker 2You know, even with all these answers, you can bet other questions probably came up later, maybe about specific task orders or unforeseen issues. It's rarely just a one and done clarification. It's often an ongoing process.
Speaker 1Definitely food for thought. It really highlights the homework businesses need to do to even participate in these kinds of government opportunities. Well, thanks for walking through this amendment with me today.
Speaker 2My pleasure, always interesting to see the gears turning.
Speaker 1Until our next exploration here on the Deep Dive.